Bienvenue, Invité
Nom d'utilisateur : Mot de passe : Se souvenir de moi
26 Sep 2020
No bulk downloads - PLEASE! THIS IS OVERLOADING OUR SERVER AND DENYING ACCESS TO COMMUNITY USERS
SVP - Pas de téléchargement en masse ! Cela surcharge le serveur et empêche la communauté d'utilisateurs d'accéder aux données
_______________________________
WE WILL BLOCK IP'S THAT ARE BULK DOWNLOADING! Nous bloquerons les IPs des personnes qui agissent de la sorte.
PLEASE GO DIRECTLY TO THE GRIB PRODUCERS (NOAA, DWD...) FOR BULK DOWNLOADS. Allez chercher les données directement à la source (NOAA, DWD ...)
Lire la suite ...
  • Page :
  • 1
  • 2

SUJET :

WRF boundary conditions - GFS v16 il y a 3 ans 7 mois #877

Hi,
The Global Forecast System (GFS) was upgraded to version 16 on March 22nd. The main change to the model includes Increase in the number of model vertical layers from 64 to 127.
I know that the Boundary conditions for WRF 12km & 4km are provided by GFS forecast data.
ِAre Boundary conditions now provided by the new version of GFS model?

Thanks

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

WRF boundary conditions - GFS v16 il y a 3 ans 7 mois #878

Hi,

Yes, all the openWRF forecasts started using GFS v16 for both initialization boundary conditions.

The increase of vertical layers to 127 in internal to the GFS simulation. NOAA only publishes about 40+ vertical layers as before, so WRF is using the same number of input layers. However, the quality of the GFS forecast is now better.

David

David

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

WRF boundary conditions - GFS v16 il y a 3 ans 7 mois #879

Hi,

Does WRF use about 40 vertical layers or 64 layers?

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

WRF boundary conditions - GFS v16 il y a 3 ans 7 mois #880

In WRF with the ARW core it is possible to set any number of vertical levels and since version 4 of WRF there are possibilities to set the distribution of the layers for different levels of the atmosphere.
In openWRF we are using the default of 45 layers with automatically determined distribution of the layers.

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

WRF boundary conditions - GFS v16 il y a 3 ans 7 mois #881

Are there any plans to increase the number of vertical layers of WRF for example doubling it from 45 layers to 90 layers?
I know that the increase of vertical layers greatly improves the performance and accuracy of the model.

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

WRF boundary conditions - GFS v16 il y a 3 ans 7 mois #882

ameerrh écrit: I know that the increase of vertical layers greatly improves the performance and accuracy of the model.

What is your basis for this claim?

There is no magic. Research into the valued of increasing WRF number of vertical layers shows very limited improvements. This has some value in the area of tropical storms and hurricanes. Even then there is no improvement in forecasting the track of the storm but only slightly better data on upper levels.

A ratio needs to be maintained between spatial resolution and vertical resolution and this means exponential increase in run time for increasing vertical resolution.

For WRF the default of 45 layers is considered optimum. The balance of the forecast domain, the choice of spatial resolution, the choice of physics and dynamic schemes, the choice of calculation time-steps and other setting all have significantly more impact on the quality of a forecast than extra vertical resolution.

Connexion pour participer à la conversation.

  • Page :
  • 1
  • 2
Temps de génération de la page : 0.114 secondes

Le téléchargement des fichiers mis à disposition sur le serveur openGribs via XyGrib et l'application elle-même resteront toujours libres et gratuits. Cependant, les coûts de fonctionnement des 3 serveurs en cloud sont significatifs, en particulier ceux liés à la bande passante.

Chaque contribution, même modeste, est très utile à garantir le bon fonctionnement du site et des serveurs. Si vous considérez XyGrib et les fichiers téléchargés utiles, merci de soutenir openGribs et XyGrib.

 

Merci de votre soutien

Aller au haut