ameerrh wrote: I know that the increase of vertical layers greatly improves the performance and accuracy of the model.
What is your basis for this claim?
There is no magic. Research into the valued of increasing WRF number of vertical layers shows very limited improvements. This has some value in the area of tropical storms and hurricanes. Even then there is no improvement in forecasting the track of the storm but only slightly better data on upper levels.
A ratio needs to be maintained between spatial resolution and vertical resolution and this means exponential increase in run time for increasing vertical resolution.
For WRF the default of 45 layers is considered optimum. The balance of the forecast domain, the choice of spatial resolution, the choice of physics and dynamic schemes, the choice of calculation time-steps and other setting all have significantly more impact on the quality of a forecast than extra vertical resolution.