Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
26 Sep 2020
No bulk downloads - PLEASE! THIS IS OVERLOADING OUR SERVER AND DENYING ACCESS TO COMMUNITY USERS
SVP - Pas de téléchargement en masse ! Cela surcharge le serveur et empêche la communauté d'utilisateurs d'accéder aux données
_______________________________
WE WILL BLOCK IP'S THAT ARE BULK DOWNLOADING! Nous bloquerons les IPs des personnes qui agissent de la sorte.
PLEASE GO DIRECTLY TO THE GRIB PRODUCERS (NOAA, DWD...) FOR BULK DOWNLOADS. Allez chercher les données directement à la source (NOAA, DWD ...)
Read More...
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

Discrepancies in Forecasts between 00z and 12z runs in WRF 4km model 3 weeks 2 days ago #961

  • ameerrh
  • ameerrh's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
  • Posts: 34
  • Thank you received: 0
Hi,
I am writing to bring to your attention an ongoing issue with the WRF 4 km model that has been observed over a prolonged period, specifically with discrepancies between the 00z and 12z runs. The 12z run is forecasting no precipitation in the coming days, whereas the 00z run predicts rain.
Additionally, the 12z run is forecasting unusually low temperatures during the night compared the 00z run.

Could you please check the reasons of these discrepancies?
Is it related to the use of different cumulus, microphysics, or radiation schemes between the two runs (00Z and 12Z)?

Furthermore, I have also noticed that the 00Z run appears to be overestimating simulated radar reflectivity.
Could you please look into this issue , along with the discrepancies mentioned above, and work towards resolving them?

Thank you

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Discrepancies in Forecasts between 00z and 12z runs in WRF 4km model 3 weeks 2 days ago #962

Hi Ameerrh,
Thanks for noticing.
The 00z and 12z runs are on different servers. The 12z was not running a cumulus scheme on the nested 4km domain but only on the 12km domain. It also was running a different micro physics scheme.
I have edited the setting to match the 06z run and set a new common micro physics scheme for both models
There should now be more consistent forecasts from the two models.

David

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Discrepancies in Forecasts between 00z and 12z runs in WRF 4km model 3 weeks 1 day ago #963

  • ameerrh
  • ameerrh's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
  • Posts: 34
  • Thank you received: 0
Hi David,
Thank you for your prompt response.
I have compared the precipitation forecasts from the 00z and 12z runs today, and there is still a significant difference between them.
Additionally, it appears that the model did not provide the simulated radar reflectivity forecasts for either the 00z or 12z runs. What is the reason?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Discrepancies in Forecasts between 00z and 12z runs in WRF 4km model 2 weeks 6 days ago #964

Hi Ameer,
Pls contact me via gmail so that I may be able to help you further
u s r sy.wild.silk
Thanks, David

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.062 seconds

Resources on this site will always be free and open with no commercialization. However, operating costs of the servers to pre-process and deliver GRIB files to XyGrib are not trivial.

If you found the site useful, please share in the effort and help keep us up and running

 

Please Support

Go to top